Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. supreme.justia.com › cases › federalRothgery v. Gillespie County | 554 U.S. 191 (2008) | Justia U ...

   supreme.justia.com › cases › federal

   • Cached

   GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. No. 07–440. Argued March 17, 2008—Decided June 23, 2008. Texas police relied on erroneous information that petitioner Rothgery had a previous felony conviction to arrest him as a felon in possession of a firearm.

2. www.law.cornell.edu › supremecourt › textROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY | US Law | LII / Legal ...

   www.law.cornell.edu › supremecourt › text

   • Cached

   certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. Texas police relied on erroneous information that petitioner Rothgery had a previous felony conviction to arrest him as a felon in possession of a firearm.

3. www.ca5.uscourts.gov › opinions › pubUnited States Court of Appeals REVISED August 2, 2007 Fifth ...

   www.ca5.uscourts.gov › opinions › pub

   GILLESPIE COUNTY TEXAS. Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin. Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. KING, Circuit Judge: In McGee v.

4. www.oyez.org › cases › 2007{{meta.fullTitle}} - Oyez

   www.oyez.org › cases › 2007

   Mar 17, 2008 · Rothgery brought suit against Gillespie County, TX for violating his civil rights by not appointing counsel as required under the Sixth Amendment. Both the district court and the Fifth Circuit rejected his claim, the Fifth Circuit stating that Rothgery's Sixth Amendment rights were not implicated because no prosecutor was present at the initial ...

5. supreme.justia.com › cases › federalSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

   supreme.justia.com › cases › federal

   See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. ROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 07–440. Argued March 17, 2008—Decided June 23, 2008.

6. casetext.com › case › rothgery-v-gillespie-county-3Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 537 F.3d 716 - Casetext

   casetext.com › case › rothgery-v-gillespie-county-3

   • Cached

   Aug 1, 2008 · Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Lee Yeakel, Judge. ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

7. People also ask

   Who argued writ of certiorari V Gillespie County?

   • WALTER A. ROTHGERY, PETITIONER v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit [June 23, 2008] Justice Souter delivered the opinion of the Court.

   Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008) - Justia US Supreme

   supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/191/

   See all results for this question

   What happened in Rothgery V Gillespie County?

   • ROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit No. 07–440. Argued March 17, 2008—Decided June 23, 2008 Texas police relied on erroneous information that petitioner Rothgery had a previous felony conviction to arrest him as a felon in possession of a firearm.

   Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008) - Justia US Supreme

   supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/191/

   See all results for this question

   What if Gillespie County had provided a lawyer?

   • B Rothgery then brought this 42 U. S. C. §1983 action against respondent Gillespie County, claiming that if the County had provided a lawyer within a reasonable time after the article 15.17 hearing, he would not have been indicted, rearrested, or jailed for three weeks.

   Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008) - Justia US Supreme

   supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/191/

   See all results for this question

   Should Texas' article 1517 hearing count as a case?

   • Texas’s article 15.17 hearing should not count as one of those situations, the County says, because it is not of critical significance, since it “allows no presentation of witness testimony and provides no opportunity to expose weaknesses in the government’s evidence, create a basis for later impeachment, or even engage in basic discovery.”

   Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008) - Justia US Supreme

   supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/191/

   See all results for this question

8. www.law.cornell.edu › supct › htmlROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY - LII / Legal Information Institute

   www.law.cornell.edu › supct › html

   • Cached

   Supreme Court. 554 U. S. ____ (2008) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. WALTER A. ROTHGERY, PETITIONER v. GILLESPIE. COUNTY, TEXAS. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. [June 23, 2008] Chief Justice Roberts, with whom Justice Scalia joins, concurring.