Search results
Dec 17, 1992 · Abstract. Some readers of this Review will remember the decision of the House of Lords in Oppenheimer v. Cattermole [1976] AC 249, for it was one of the fe.
Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249 is a judicial decision of the English courts relating to whether English law should refuse to recognise Nazi era laws relating to the appropriation of Jewish property.
Jun 20, 2024 · This chapter considers the journey from the well-known House of Lords judgment in Oppenheimer v Cattermole through PIL scholarship to philosophy of law. It shows that ‘alterity’ is an animating theme of all three in the form of the legal subject’s question ‘But, how can that be law for me?’
for the English courts was whether Mr. Oppenheimer was liable to United Kingdom income tax for the period 1953 to 1968 on two pensions which he received from the Federal Republic. There was no doubt that by virtue of his naturalisation, Mr. Oppenheimer was a British national throughout that period. The sole question
Nov 20, 2020 · My argument works by excavating the ‘deep juridical structure’ of the House of Lords decision in Oppenheimer v. Cattermole (1976) through the lens of an article by the great PrIL scholar, F.A. Mann, which changed the course of the case.
- David Dyzenhaus
- 2020
He held that Mr. Oppenheimer had 2 dual nationality in those years - in that he was a national of Germany as well as of England - and that, accordingly, under the Convention, he was exempt from English income tax.
People also ask
What is Oppenheimer v Cattermole?
Was Oppenheimer v Cattermole a human rights abuse?
Did Oppenheimer have a dual nationality?
What happened to Oppenheimer?
Was Meier Oppenheimer a dual national?
Did Oppenheimer lose German nationality?
It is true that under the terms of the agreements the question must be decided by English law (see Art. II (3)), but English law requires as a rule that the question of foreign nationality falls to be decided according to the municipal law of the foreign state concerned.
