Search results
May 18, 2021 · Unfortunately, not all studies using the dictator game have implemented a “no recipient” condition, but it is critical to understanding the underlying motivations of the subjects.
- Jennifer Vonk
- vonk@oakland.edu
Jan 1, 2020 · Download: Download full-size image. Fig. 1. Types of Dictator Games. (a) Non-interactive (two players, one dictator): the dictator's own material payoff depends only on how much he/she keeps, and the recipient's material payoff depends only on how much the dictator gives.
- Philip D. Grech, Heinrich H. Nax, Heinrich H. Nax
- 2020
Oct 1, 2010 · Even in a double-blind environment, the Red Cross attracted donations from over 73% of the dictators, as opposed to only 27% in the anonymous recipients condition (Eckel and Grossman, 1996). The average level of contributions was tripled.
- Francesco Guala, Luigi Mittone
- 2010
Jul 4, 2018 · The dictator game is an experimental paradigm in which one participant (the dictator) receives an endowment and then decides to what extent she/he wants to split this endowment with another, anonymous participant (the recipient).
They for instance have played a one-shot game with students, asking dictators to divide a pie of $10 given to them between them-selves and an anonymous recipient from the same subject pool. What looks like a perfectly standard dictator game implicitly provides data on one shot versus repeated games; on games
- 494KB
- 45
May 9, 2022 · In Sects. 2 and 3, we introduce the charity dictator game and identify a range of experimental design issues. In Sect. 4, we summarize findings on the external validity of the game. In Sect. 5, we set out research questions that can be effectively studied using the game.
People also ask
Does the dictator game have a “no recipient” condition?
Can a dictator take money from another player?
What are the different types of dictator games?
Is the dictator game useful?
Does a dictator care about the distribution of payoffs?
Can interactive dictator games be explained without auxiliary variables?
The action set variation includes choices in which the dictator can “take” money from the other player. Empirical results question the received interpretation of dictator game giving: many fewer agents are willing to transfer money when the action set includes taking.