Search results
Oct 15, 2020 · Empirical evidence for linguistic relativity is reviewed from the perspectives of first language influences on cognition, including color, motion, number, time, objects, and nonlinguistic representations, and from the prism of cross-linguistic influences.
- Hye K. Pae
- 2020
Jul 26, 2016 · This article outlines the history of empirical research on linguistic relativity, surveys current research, and appraises critically the trends of the past decade, highlighting conceptual and methodological issues.
- John A. Lucy
- 2016
Time also merits more research with respect to the linguistic relativity/universalism debate, language acquisition, and language modelling in computational linguistics, as well as theoretical and applied contrastive studies.
We identify seven categories of hypotheses about the possible effects of language on thought across a wide range of domains, including motion, color, spatial relations, number, and false belief understanding.
- 200KB
- 13
Oct 27, 2010 · We identify seven categories of hypotheses about the possible effects of language on thought across a wide range of domains, including motion, color, spatial relations, number, and false belief understanding.
This chapter presents not a linguistic theory or model but a body of research falling under the cover term linguistic relativity. Most generally, linguistic relativity studies investigate possible effects of natural language on purportedly non-linguistic cognition.
People also ask
Does linguistic relativity study time?
Does linguistic relativity influence cognition?
Will linguistic relativity ever be resolved?
Why is linguistic relativity a problem?
Can linguistic relativity be fully addressed without a comparison?
Does linguistic relativity evolve?
This article explores the treatment of linguistic relativity within works generally representative of cognitive linguistics and presents a survey of classic and more modern (pre- and post-1980s) research within linguistics, anthropology, and psychology.
