Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. On August 31, 1976, Judge Battisti ruled that Cleveland Public Schools and the Ohio State Board of Education had violated plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection of the law by “intentionally fostering and maintaining a segregated school system within the Cleveland public schools.”

  3. Wright, legal case (1977) in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that corporal punishment in public schools did not fall within the scope of the ‘cruel and unusual punishments’ clause of the Eighth Amendment and did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of procedural due process.

    • Joseph Oluwole
  4. The Court decided that the program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as long as parents using the program were allowed to choose among a range of secular and religious schools.

  5. Connecting the First Amendment to the Fourteenth Amendment, Thomas pointed out that minority children were disproportionately affected by the failing schools in the inner city. This meant that true educational equality for children of all ethnicities could be achieved only through a voucher program. Concurrence

  6. The Cleveland public schools were performing badly, and in an effort to resolve this issue, the state of Ohio put into effect a school voucher plan under which parents could opt to enroll their children in private schools taking part in the program.

  7. May 16, 2018 · Board of Education, ruling that racial segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The upshot: Students of color in America would no longer...

  8. ZELMAN V. SIMMONS-HARRIS was a landmark Supreme Court case upholding, in a 5-4 decision announced on June 27, 2002, the constitutionality of an Ohio law providing vouchers to Cleveland students to attend the public or private, including parochial, schools of their choice.