Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. While investigating mysterious activities in the world diamond market, 007 (Sean Connery) discovers that his evil nemesis Blofeld (Charles Gray) is stockpiling the gems to use in his deadly laser...

    • Reviews

      Rotten Tomatoes, home of the Tomatometer, is the most...

    • See All Photos

      Diamonds Are Forever Pictures and Photo Gallery -- Check out...

    • Movie Reviews

      Diamonds Are Forever Reviews. All Critics. Top Critics. All...

  2. Diamonds Are Forever Reviews. All Critics. Top Critics. All Audience. Verified Audience. John Hofsess Maclean's Magazine. Only the British apparently (judging by dozens of unfortunate...

  3. 23 hours ago · Critics Consensus: Diamonds are Forever is a largely derivative affair, but it's still pretty entertaining nonetheless, thanks to great stunts, witty dialogue, and the presence of Sean Connery.

  4. On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 64% based on 53 reviews with an average rating of 6.3/10. The website's consensus states, " Diamonds are Forever is a largely derivative affair, but it's still pretty entertaining nonetheless, thanks to great stunts, witty dialogue, and the presence of Sean ...

  5. Jul 11, 2001 · Diamonds Are Forever (1971) Reviewed by Danny Graydon. Updated 11 July 2001. Following the unexpected anomaly that was 1969's "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" (superlative action thriller,...

  6. Action. 119 minutes ‧ PG ‧ 1971. Roger Ebert. January 1, 1971. 2 min read. The cultists like the early James Bond movies best, but I dunno. They may have been more tightly directed films, but they didn’t understand the Bond mythos as fully as “ Goldfinger ” and “Diamonds Are Forever.”.

  7. People also ask

  8. Running Time: 118 minutes. Certificate: PG. Original Title: Diamonds Are Forever. After the minor debacle of George Lazenby’s momentary tenure as 007, the Bond producers offered Connery a hefty...

  1. People also search for