Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.rottentomatoes.com › m › diamonds_are_foreverDiamonds Are Forever - Rotten Tomatoes

   www.rottentomatoes.com › m › diamonds_are_forever

   • Cached

   While investigating mysterious activities in the world diamond market, 007 (Sean Connery) discovers that his evil nemesis Blofeld (Charles Gray) is stockpiling the gems to use in his deadly laser...

   • 64% (53)
   • Director: Guy Hamilton

   • Content Rating: PG
   • Actors: Sean Connery

2. Videos

   • 

     27:30

     youtube.com

     Diamonds Are Forever | In-depth Movie Review

     17 Oct 2018

     152.3K views

   • 

     12:59

     youtube.com

     Diamonds are Forever Movie Review

     13 Aug 2023

     18 views

   • 

     3:48

     youtube.com

     007 Diamonds Are Forever Theatrical Trailer

     5 Jun 2009

     25.7K views

   View all

3. www.rottentomatoes.com › m › diamonds_are_foreverDiamonds Are Forever - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

   www.rottentomatoes.com › m › diamonds_are_forever

   • Cached

   All Audience. Verified Audience. John Hofsess Maclean's Magazine. Only the British apparently (judging by dozens of unfortunate imitations) can make a crude sex-and-violence formula yield such...

4. www.metacritic.com › movie › diamonds-are-foreverDiamonds Are Forever Reviews - Metacritic

   www.metacritic.com › movie › diamonds-are-forever

   • Cached

   Diamonds Are Forever, the seventh James Bond film, can be viewed as either one of the best or one of the worst Bond movies. Depending on how you look at it, "Diamonds" is the ultimate Bond film if you don't need anything more than mindless harmless amusement.

   • 59% (11)
   • Director: Guy Hamilton

   • Content Rating: PG

5. www.reddit.com › r › JamesBondUnpopular opinion: Diamonds Are Forever is the most under ...

   www.reddit.com › r › JamesBond

   • Cached

   I actually love the weirdo goofy vibe of Diamonds Are Forever. It’s like the Halloweeen 3 of the Bond series - it’s out there and quirky but has enough Bond-ness to make it endearing and familiar and the villains are a lot of fun! Plus seeing old Vegas is really nostalgic and cool.

6. www.empireonline.com › movies › reviewsDiamonds Are Forever Review | Movie - Empire

   www.empireonline.com › movies › reviews

   • Cached

   Diamonds Are Forever Review. While investigating mysterious activities in the world diamond market, 007 discovers that his evil nemesis Blofeld is stock-piling the gems to use in his deadly...

7. filmstories.co.uk › features › diamonds-are-foreverDiamonds Are Forever: saluting an underappreciated James Bond ...

   filmstories.co.uk › features › diamonds-are-forever

   • Cached

   Feb 23, 2021 · The seventh film in Eon Productions’ James Bond movie series, Diamonds Are Forever celebrates it’s 50 th anniversary this year. Critically praised at the time of release, time has not been kind to Sean Connery’s second (but not final) swansong as 007.

8. People also ask

   Is Diamonds are Forever a good Bond movie?

   • After struggling with a few films to find the right vibe and tone for a Bond film, DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER finds a nice balance that would work for a while. Thanks to the clarity and cut of past 007 films, Sean Connery will sparkle forever.

   Diamonds Are Forever - Movie Reviews | Rotten Tomatoes

   www.rottentomatoes.com/m/diamonds_are_forever/reviews

   See all results for this question

   Is Diamonds are Forever a mellow Bond movie?

   • Diamonds are Forever falls in the former category although I'm not totally sure why. It's like after the serious action-packed 60's they decided to just calm down and relax, this is the most chilled out and mellow Bond film there is. It has that air of coolness that only early 70's films seem to have.

   Diamonds Are Forever (1971) - Diamonds Are Forever (1971) - User ... - IMDb

   www.imdb.com/title/tt0066995/reviews

   See all results for this question

   Who are the actors in Diamonds are Forever?

   • From 'Diamonds Are Forever' (1971), James Bond, 007, Lois Maxwell (Miss Moneypenny), and Ian Fleming are among the actors.

   40+ Bond Girls - Lois Maxwell ( The indomitable Miss

   www.pinterest.com/bilbobuggerlugs/bond-girls-lois-maxwell-the-indomitable-miss-money/

   See all results for this question

   What makes Diamonds are Forever so special?

   • Diamonds are Forever has one element that makes it unique: a lot of Bond movies are more or less willingly comedic. Not Diamonds. This is an utter parody, in ways that you wouldn't believe if I spoiled you. I haven't laughed this hard at any Bond movie, and truly, it is the original Austin Powers.

   Diamonds Are Forever - Metacritic

   www.metacritic.com/movie/diamonds-are-forever/

   See all results for this question

   Is Diamonds are Forever a good book?

   • Diamonds Are Forever is plagued with problems. After a promising start, the story devolves into idiocy. The action scenes here are just lame, and given the choice between good action and lame story (as we had in You Only Live Twice) and good story and lame action, I'll take the action every time.

   Diamonds Are Forever - Metacritic

   www.metacritic.com/movie/diamonds-are-forever/

   See all results for this question

   Where can I watch Diamonds are Forever?

   • Watch Diamonds Are Forever with a subscription on Prime Video, rent on Fandango at Home, Apple TV, or buy on Fandango at Home, Apple TV. Diamonds are Forever is a largely derivative affair, but it's still pretty entertaining nonetheless, thanks to great stunts, witty dialogue, and the presence of Sean Connery.

   Diamonds Are Forever - Rotten Tomatoes

   www.rottentomatoes.com/m/diamonds_are_forever

   See all results for this question

9. stankosstance.com › 2024/07/13 › ranking-james-bondRanking James Bond Films: #17 – “Diamonds Are Forever” (1971)

   stankosstance.com › 2024/07/13 › ranking-james-bond

   Jul 13, 2024 · Diamonds Are Forever is a return and a second sendoff to Sean Connery as James Bond. George Lazenby took a damn good shot at playing 007 in 1969, but the company wanted Connery back and paid him $1,250,000, which was a fortune for that time.