Search results
Other kinds of affects, e.g., cheerfulness, merriment, melancholy, and grief, are treated as identical to pleasure and pain; they remain undefined because they are purely bodily states, that is, kinds of pleasure and pain unmodified by any other associated idea.
In a physiological and biological context, a person is a human with certain essential physiological and biological characteristics. Legally, the answer is broader. According to the law, a person is anyone or anything that can initiate and be subject to legal proceedings.
One might say that the Boethian definition is implicit here insofar as it is rational nature that grounds these features of persons. But this would make the Boethian definition at least incomplete because it does not make explicit those elements of person that are uppermost or central in its use.
- 50KB
- 10
Aug 20, 2002 · Personal identity deals with philosophical questions that arise about ourselves by virtue of our being people (or as lawyers and philosophers like to say, persons). This contrasts with questions about ourselves that arise by virtue of our being living things, conscious beings, moral agents, or material objects.
This best-selling dictionary covers all areas of philosophy and contains terms from the related fields of religion, science, and logic. Clear and authoritative definitions and make it an essential resource for students and teachers and an ideal introduction for anyone with an interest in philosophy. This edition includes 500 biographies of ...
What does the noun merriment mean? There are four meanings listed in OED's entry for the noun merriment, three of which are labelled obsolete. See ‘Meaning & use’ for definitions, usage, and quotation evidence. merriment has developed meanings and uses in subjects including.
People also ask
How is 'merriment' formed in English?
What is a person in philosophy?
When was the word 'merriment' first used?
What makes a person a moral person?
Who is not a person?
May 27, 2019 · Summary. According to a philosophical commonplace, Aristotle defined human beings as rational animals. When one takes a closer look at the surviving texts, however, it is surprisingly hard to find such a definition.
