Choose from over 40,000+ eBooks, AudioBooks, Courses & Podcasts now - for Free!
Search results
In this paper I wish to defend the claim that epistemic indolence is epistemically irrational. I will argue that two of the attempts to bar indolence prevail against the authors' objections. I will suggest a more suitable theoretical motivation for the claim than that rejected by the authors. I
Semantic Scholar extracted view of "``Epistemic Indolence"" by Richard Foley et al.
Sep 8, 2019 · This study aims to present that the most visible and drastic changes in the life of modern humans are caused by the ability human to be a person that is equal to be tolerant.
Sep 6, 2022 · Written by a team of more than 550 experts and now widely translated, it contains approximately 5,000 entries ranging from short definitions to longer articles. It is designed to facilitate the understanding of philosophy at all levels and in all fields.
Epistemic Indolence. Author(s): Richard Foley and Richard Fumerton. Source: Mind, New Series, Vol. 91, No. 361 (Jan., 1982), pp. 38-56. Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2253197 Accessed: 03-01-2017 19:48 UTC
If the individual who labeled you lazy was a foreigner who also made judgments about you and the Filipino people in your own country, how would you respond? José Rizal wrote The Indolence of the Filipinos, a socio-political essay, in reaction to the criticism of Indio, or Malay, Indolence.
People also ask
What is an example of Indolence?
What does John Locke and Immanuel Kant say about tolerance?
What are the dimensions of tolerance?
Is tolerance a problem?
Jan 1, 1982 · This PDF is available to Subscribers Only View Article Abstract & Purchase Options For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.