Yahoo Web Search

Sign In
  1. www.allcriminaljusticeschools.com/criminaljustice/school-programs

    AdCriminal Justice Schools | Kentucky Criminal Justice Schools

    Enrollment Now Open for Online and Campus Criminal Justice Degree Programs. Forensic Science Technicians Got Their Education & Degree Through Us! Request More Info

Search results

  1. youth.gov › juvenile-justice › diversion-programsDiversion Programs - Youth.gov

    The purpose of diversion programs is to redirect youthful offenders from the justice system through programming, supervision, and supports. Arguments that support diversion programs include the following: Diverting youth who have committed minor offenses away from the system and towards community-based treatment involving the youth's family and ...

    • References

      Youth who receive special education services under the...

    • Reentry

      Research has demonstrated that reentry services and...

  2. www.sentencingproject.org › publications › protectProtect and Redirect: America’s Growing Movement to Divert ...

    Mar 20, 2024 · As part of its 2014 reform law, Kentucky required each judicial district to create a team to assist youth with high needs who don’t make progress toward completing diversion.

    • Richard Mendel

  3. www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk › diversionDiversion - Criminal Justice Inspectorates

    Oct 27, 2023 · Youth diversion can reduce crime, cut costs, and lead to better outcomes for children. Diversion is a term that can refer to several different concepts and has no fixed meaning in the law in...

  4. www.justiceinnovation.org › sites › defaultDisparities in youth diversion – an evidence review

    Introduction. Point-of-arrest youth diversion gives young people the chance to avoid both formal criminal justice processing and a criminal record, in return for the completion of community-based interventions. Youth diversion is an increasingly well-embedded practice in England and Wales: research by the Centre for Justice Innovation in 2019 ...

    • 226KB
    • 10

  5. www.aecf.org › blog › what-is-juvenile-diversionWhat Is Juvenile Diversion? - The Annie E. Casey Foundation

    • Does Juve­Nile Diver­Sion Work?
    • Which Youth Should Be Divert­Ed from for­mal Court Processing?
    • How Com­Mon Is Juve­Nile Diversion?
    • Could More Youth Be Safe­Ly Diverted?
    • Who Decides to Divert Youth? When?
    • Is Juve­Nile Diver­Sion Con­Sis­Tent from Place to place?
    • Are There Dis­Par­I­Ties in Diver­Sion For Juveniles?
    • What hap­pens When A Youth Is Divert­Ed from The Juve­Nile Jus­Tice System?
    • What’s The dif­fer­ence Between Diver­Sion and Probation?
    • What Diver­Sion prac­tices Are Coun­Ter­Pro­Duc­Tive For Juve­Nile Justice?

    Yes, diver­sion is more effec­tive in reduc­ing recidi­vism than con­ven­tion­al judi­cial inter­ven­tions accord­ing to peer-reviewed research. When youth assessed as low risk are divert­ed, they are 45% less like­ly to reof­fend than com­pa­ra­ble youth fac­ing for­mal court pro­cess­ing. In oth­er words, it’s more effec­tive for juve­nile courts...

    See full list on aecf.org

    As a rule, young peo­ple should be divert­ed unless they demon­strate a sig­nif­i­cant threat to pub­lic safe­ty; for exam­ple, they have been accused of com­mit­ting a seri­ous vio­lent felony or have a his­to­ry of seri­ous or chron­ic offending.

    See full list on aecf.org

    In 2018, 41% of juve­nile refer­rals nation­wide were divert­ed, accord­ing to the fed­er­al Office of Juve­nile Jus­tice Delin­quen­cy and Pre­ven­tion. Of the 59% of U.S. delin­quen­cy refer­rals that were for­mal­ly processed, only 6% were for vio­lent offenses. “A sig­nif­i­cant share of cas­es for­mal­ly processed still involve youth who are a...

    See full list on aecf.org

    The Casey Foun­da­tion cal­cu­lates that at least 60% of juve­nile cas­es — and like­ly a larg­er per­cent­age — could be safe­ly divert­ed if for­mal pro­ba­tion was lim­it­ed to only youth with seri­ous offens­es or those oth­er­wise assessed to be a risk to pub­lic safe­ty. Some juris­dic­tions have already met or exceed­ed that tar­get. For ins...

    See full list on aecf.org

    Juve­nile diver­sion deci­sions are most often made by police offi­cers, edu­ca­tors, pros­e­cu­tors, judges or oth­er court staff and can occur at any of three stages: 1. Pri­or to arrest:The first oppor­tu­ni­ty for diver­sion is for police offi­cers not to make an arrest or for school offi­cials not to involve police or ini­ti­ate a court refer­...

    See full list on aecf.org

    No, diver­sion prac­tices vary quite a bit from place to place, with vari­a­tions relat­ed to: 1. when diver­sion occurs, such as pre-arrest, pre-pros­e­cu­tion or pre-adjudication; 2. who makes the diver­sion deci­sion (for exam­ple, police, pros­e­cu­tion, pro­ba­tion or the court); 3. the eli­gi­bil­i­ty and exclu­sion cri­te­ria, both writ­ten ...

    See full list on aecf.org

    Yes, youth of col­or are divert­ed from juve­nile court far less fre­quent­ly than their white peers. Despite hav­ing poli­cies that are meant to be equi­table, sys­tem deci­sion mak­ers are more like­ly to divert white youth from for­mal pros­e­cu­tion — and to deem them suc­cess­ful­ly divert­ed — than their peers of col­or. The best nation­al da...

    See full list on aecf.org

    Depend­ing on indi­vid­ual cir­cum­stances, diver­sion can range in inten­si­ty. Options include warn and release — which means that par­ents, guardians, school staff and oth­ers in the com­mu­ni­ty, rather than the jus­tice sys­tem, address the mis­con­duct — and restora­tive jus­tice prac­tices, which use medi­a­tion to reach res­o­lu­tions. For ...

    See full list on aecf.org

    Diver­sion dif­fers from pro­ba­tion in sev­er­al fun­da­men­tal ways. 1. Divert­ed youth should nev­er be assigned to pro­ba­tion or super­vised by a pro­ba­tion officer. 2. There should be no pos­si­bil­i­ty of place­ment or con­fine­ment for fail­ure in diver­sion. This means that divert­ed youth should nev­er be sub­ject to court-ordered con­di...

    See full list on aecf.org

    “Juve­nile courts and pro­ba­tion agen­cies should aban­don the prac­tice of plac­ing divert­ed youth on infor­mal pro­ba­tion case­loads, essen­tial­ly ​“pro­ba­tion lite,”” Mon­roe says. Juris­dic­tions need to insti­tute safe­guards so diver­sion doesn’t lead to coun­ter­pro­duc­tive net widen­ing, where diver­sion pro­grams end up serv­ing youn...

    See full list on aecf.org

  6. www.ncsl.org › civil-and-criminal-justiceDiversion in the Juvenile Justice System

    May 23, 2022 · In 2014, Kentucky passed Senate Bill 200 which requires prosecutors to offer diversion to youth with first-time misdemeanor offenses. Participation in counseling, paying restitution, abiding by a curfew, and/or completing community service are just a few of the alternative justice strategies used.

  7. People also ask

  8. www.urban.org › sites › defaultAssessing Juvenile Diversion Reforms in Kentucky

    In this brief, we summarize findings and implications from Urban’s analysis of Kentucky’s juvenile diversion reforms. Key findings include the following: The rate of diversion increased for all youth after Senate Bill 200. Between 2014 and 2018, the proportion of all complaints not dismissed at intake that entered into diversion agreements

  1. Related searches

    define diversion in law schools vs school in kentucky high school rankingsdefine diversion in law schools vs school in kentucky high school sports
    define diversion in law schools vs school in kentucky high school studentsdefine diversion in law schools vs school in kentucky high school basketball
    define diversion in law schools vs school in kentucky high school footballdefine diversion in law schools vs school in kentucky high school football scores
  2. People also search for