Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Aug 8, 2023 · The most common example of the crime of false pretenses involves someone with superior knowledge of the truth taking advantage of someone unaware. For example, an antique dealer tries to sell a purportedly vintage Tiffany lamp, but it is an imitation, and the dealer knows it.

  2. Under common law, false pretense is defined as a representation of a present or past fact, which the thief knows to be false, and which he intends will and does cause the victim to pass title of his property. That is, false pretense is the acquisition of title from a victim by fraud or misrepresentation of a material past or present fact.

  3. The language used in law is changing. Many lawyers are now adopting a plain English style. But there are still legal phrases that baffle non-lawyers. This guide is intended to help in two ways: • it should help non-lawyers understand legal phrases; and • it should give lawyers ideas for explaining the legal phrases that they use.

    • 336KB
    • 82
  4. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › ScamScam - Wikipedia

    A scam, or a confidence trick, is an attempt to defraud a person or group after first gaining their trust. Confidence tricks exploit victims using a combination of the victim's credulity , naïveté , compassion , vanity , confidence , irresponsibility , and greed .

  5. Con trick A confidence trick or act of deception to gain advantage or financial benefit. Example: “The email promising a huge inheritance turned out to be a con trick to get her bank details.”

  6. May 26, 2014 · The goal of a fraudulent act is to trick or mislead an innocent person into thinking that something has a certain value (or is worthless) and which the perpetrator knows is false. While the term is defined very broadly, all fraud offenses include some type of misrepresentation, deception and/or false statement.

  7. People also ask

  8. May 5, 2015 · In conspiracy cases, there will often be significant areas of evidence which, on the face of it, seem damming but which in fact are not admissible against a particular defendant. A basic rule of evidence is that, ordinarily, acts done or words uttered by ‘A’ cannot be evidence against ‘B’.

  1. People also search for