Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Hart’s “responsible Creator argument” proves too much, for if God is morally responsible for eschatological outcomes, then why is God not also responsible for historical evils?

  2. Jun 13, 2022 · The belief that a God of infinite intellect, justice, love, and power would condemn rational beings to a state of endless suffering, or would allow them to condemn themselves on account of their ...

  3. More recently, the doctrine has received the renewed interest of a specific debate amongst evangelicals concerning whether hell is eternal conscious torment or whether the wicked are annihilated after judgment. This article will attempt to outline the nature of these recent debates.

  4. Jan 25, 2020 · The possibility of an eternal hell must remain, at least hypothetically, as the tragic corollary of angelic and human freedom, which God respects absolutely as He stands humbly at the door and knocks. (To claim, as Hart seems to do, that God created us free, but not sufficiently free, seems to smell of another heresy altogether. We must believe ...

  5. Oct 18, 2019 · Might it be that a just, good, and loving God could not send people to Hell, especially for eternity? This essay does not assume that Hell (or God) actually exists, but reviews several prominent philosophical responses to questions like these, as well as critiques and objections to these answers.

  6. The God of Hell should be held in loathing, contempt and scorn. A God who threatens eternal pain should be hated, not loved - cursed, not worshiped. A heaven presided over by such a God must be below the lowest hell. Robert Green Ingersoll

  7. People also ask

  8. Sep 9, 2022 · Since the Thomistic Autonomy Defense is a greater good defense, it is necessary to address Hart’s general criticism of such defenses and show why it is ineffective. In order to do so, we will first have to take a look at Hart’s main argument against hell—the argument from the nature of God.

  1. People also search for