Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Front Matter Download; XML; Table of Contents Download; XML; Preface Download; XML; Abbreviations

  2. Jul 5, 2018 · Susan Meld Shell, Boston College: This is a consistently illuminating and, in terms of its own aims, successful study of a topic long neglected, especially in the English-speaking literature. For the care and intelligence with which Rosen addresses it, the author is owed a special debt of gratitude. Thomas Pogge, Columbia University:

    • Allen D. Rosen
    • July 05, 2018
    • 1993
  3. The Role of Justice. Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought. A theory however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue; likewise laws and institutions no matter how effi-cient and well-arranged must be reformed or abolished if they are unjust.

  4. And yet, I believe, there is much more to be said. The deeper and more significant differences between Kant's work and contemporary Kantianism lie not, I shall argue, in the specific conclusions about justice or about morality that each body of work offers, but in the background conceptions of action, freedom and reason on which each relies. Type.

    • Onora O'Neill
    • 2000
  5. Justice is less like a measuring rod than a box of tools: faced with a task – a decision to be reached or a rule to be applied – we know in most cases which tool to pull out and use. What is harder is to express this knowledge in the form of general principles – to create a theory of justice.

  6. Kanter’s work has generated a stream of research within gender and organizational studies with her tokenism theory being tested in a variety of work contexts. This body of research includes union representatives (Izraeli, 1983); elite law firms (Chambliss and Uggen, 2000); Wall Street professionals (Roth, 2004); male nurses (Heikes, 1991;

  7. People also ask

  8. This article applies Charles W. Mills’ notion of the domination contract to develop a Kantian theory of justice. The concept of domination underlying the domination contract is best understood as structural domination, which unjustifiably authorizes institutions and labour practices to weaken vulnerable groups’ public standing as free, equal and independent citizens.

  1. People also search for