Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Indiana Courts Case Search - MyCase. Eviction case? Apply for rent assistance and learn about settling your case. Subscribe to content by RSS or Email. Follow us on Twitter. Indiana Courts YouTube Channel. Get our shared photos on Flickr. Indiana Supreme Court, Public Access.

  2. Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 23A-CR-260 | October 26, 2023 Page 14 of 15 transmission of the case to the prosecutor’s office, however, was harmless, and Morgan’s sentence is not inappropriate.

  3. New and archived opinions from the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Tax Court. Read & search opinions

  4. Indiana Supreme Court . Supreme Court Case No. 21S-CT-240 . Chad Albert Staat and Julie Staat , Appellants (Plaintiffs below) –v– Indiana Department of Transportation , Appellee (Defendant below). Argued: June 2 3, 2021 | Decided: December 9, 2021 . Appeal from the Dearborn Superior Court, No. 15D01-1405- CT-24

    • Opinion by Justice Goff
    • Goff, Justice.
    • Conclusion

    Chief Justice Rush and Justices David and Massa concur. Justice Slaughter concurs in Parts I and II and in the judgment.

    This litigation arises from the sale of forty dump trucks—a transaction in goods governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The agreement governing this sale contained a warranty and a one-year limitations period for filing a breach-of-contract suit. Mechanical problems plagued the trucks soon after delivery. Several years later, following sell...

    For these reasons, we affirm the trial court’s order denying summary judgment and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Rush, C.J., and David and Massa, JJ., concur. Slaughter, J., concurs in Parts I and II and in the judgment. A T T O R N E Y S F O R A P P E L L A N T S David T. Schaefer Anthony M. Zelli Dinsmore & Shohl LLP Loui...

  5. Jul 20, 2021 · [5]On September 8, 2020, the Indiana Supreme Court issued an opinion in D.P. v. State, 151 N.E.3d 1210 (Ind. 2020), which involved the issue of “a juvenile court’s ability to waive an individual who is twenty-one or older into adult criminal court.” D.P., 151 N.E.3d at 1212.

  6. In this case we consider whether Indiana Code section 34-29-2-1 – providing that the governor of the State of Indiana is “privileged from arrest on civil process, and from obeying any subpoena to testify” – operates to preclude a trial court from issuing an order to compel the Governor’s deposition in a contract dispute brought by the State of I...

  1. People also search for