Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. This case raises questions of whether the Supreme Court of Virginia (Virginia Court) and its chief justice are officially immune from suit in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the Virginia Court's disciplinary rules governing the conduct of attorneys and whether attorney's fees were properly awarded under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C ...

  2. Having prevailed in its § 1983 suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Virginia Supreme Court and its Chief Justice (together, the "Virginia Court"), the issue now is whether respondent is entitled to attorney's fees from that court1 under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988. This was also the issue we addressed the last time this case came ...

  3. Cesare Zavattini Selected Writ-ings, a two-volume collection of texts representative of Zavattini’s volcanic output, translated and curated by David Brancaleone; and Cesare Zavattini’s Neo-realism and the Afterlife of an Idea: An Intellec-tual Biography, a companion volume by the same author. These volumes help flesh out

  4. earn IN TRANSLATION Zavattini, above and beyond Neorealism by Giorgio Bertellini and Courtney Ritter a> £ </) (0 X ¡2 o >. a> > 'c Z> <D-C >«.a m o CN Outside ism.1 as more one This than of of the Italy, six is, key however, decades, Cesare screenwriters Zavattini Zavattini a most and reductive (1902-1989) occupied theorists characterization.

  5. The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed on different reasoning. It explained that the case was most properly resolved with reference to the Fourth Amendment’s auto-mobile exception. 292 Va. 486, 496–501, 790 S. E. 2d 611, 616–618 (2016). Under that framework, it held that Officer Rhodes had probable cause to believe that the

    • 172KB
    • 32
  6. Jul 15, 2024 · He served as an amicus curiae in the case’s certiorari stage, submitting a brief in an advisory role when the court was deciding whether to review the case. Once the Supreme Court granted cert, he also filed a brief on the merits of the case, explaining to the Supreme Court how and why the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision was flawed.

  7. People also ask

  8. VIRGINIA. No. 16–1348. Argued February 20, 2018—Decided June 22, 2018. Petitioner Michael Currier was indicted for burglary, grand larceny, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Because the prosecution could introduce evidence of Mr. Currier’s prior bur-glary and larceny convictions to prove the felon-in-possession ...

  1. People also search for