Search results
Jul 1, 2021 · Case Summary. On 07/01/2021 CELLIN GLUCK, filed a Civil Right - Other Civil Right lawsuit against COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are DAVID SOTELO and ANNE RICHARDSON. The case status is Pending - Other ...
Oct 18, 2023 · Request redaction. On January 01, 1970, Gluck Caroline et al. filed a Intentional Torts - (Torts) case represented by Douglas Carl Edwin against Beardsley Bria et al. respresented by Raza Aamir in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County, CA. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, with David Sotelo presiding.
In Gluck v. County of Los Angeles (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 121, the court held that a news rack ordinance which was narrowly drawn to protect persons from unwilling exposure to explicit sexual material which is likely to be offensive to the unwilling viewer should be viewed as a "time, place and manner regulation," and as such, did not intrude in the state preempted areas of obscenity and ...
Specialties: Assistant Director, Unit Prodution Manger, Director<br>Directors Guild of… · Experience: Protean Image Group / P.I.G. · Location: Los Angeles County · 500+ connections on LinkedIn.
- 500+
- Protean Image Group / P.I.G.
- 2.2K
- Los Angeles County, California, United States
Jan 30, 2016 · In Los Angeles, thousands pass this statue each day without knowing anything about the man who saved thousands of lives roughly 70 years ago. ... Cellin Gluck: After Schindler’s ...
Sep 1, 2016 · Cellin Gluck, director of “Persona Non Grata: The Story of Chiune Sugihara.” photo by Stanlee Mirador. Cellin Gluck is not your typical Japanese American. He was actually born in Wakayama Prefecture to a Jewish American father from New York, Jay Gluck, and a Japanese American mother, Sumi Hiramoto Gluck, who was born and raised in Lodi, Calif.
In Gluck v. County of Los Angeles (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 121 [ 155 Cal.Rptr. 435], the court held that a news rack ordinance which was narrowly drawn to protect persons from unwilling exposure to explicit sexual material which is likely to be offensive to the unwilling viewer should be viewed as a "time, place and manner regulation," and as such ...
