Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. View Cellin Gluck’s profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members. ... Los Angeles, California, United States -----Los Angeles, California, United States ...

    • 500+
    • Protean Image Group / P.I.G.
    • 2.2K
    • Los Angeles County, California, United States
  2. Jul 1, 2021 · Case Summary. On 07/01/2021 CELLIN GLUCK, filed a Civil Right - Other Civil Right lawsuit against COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judges overseeing this case are DAVID SOTELO and ANNE RICHARDSON. The case status is Pending - Other ...

  3. Oct 18, 2023 · Request redaction. On January 01, 1970, Gluck Caroline et al. filed a Intentional Torts - (Torts) case represented by Douglas Carl Edwin against Beardsley Bria et al. respresented by Raza Aamir in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County, CA. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, with David Sotelo presiding.

  4. Cellin believes his multi-cultural upbringing and his own diverse ‘composition’ gives him an innate sensibility for things both Eastern and Western. Allowing him to bridge cultures visually, viscerally and artistically as well as emotionally.

  5. Gluck was born in Los Angeles. His father, Cellin Gluck [ ja ] , is a film director and producer, and his mother, Karin Beck, was a production assistant and line producer . Griffin's father was born in Wakayama Prefecture , Japan, to American parents, and was raised partly in Kobe , Japan.

  6. Oct 7, 2021 · Friday, October 15, 2021 – 6:30 pm on Zoom. J-Sei’s filmmaker series continues online with a special guest appearance by writer-producer-director Cellin Gluck, who will discuss his decades-long career in film production. Growing up in Japan and currently based in Los Angeles, Cellin has worked as assistant director on several blockbuster ...

  7. In Gluck v. County of Los Angeles (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 121, the court held that a news rack ordinance which was narrowly drawn to protect persons from unwilling exposure to explicit sexual material which is likely to be offensive to the unwilling viewer should be viewed as a "time, place and manner regulation," and as such, did not intrude in the state preempted areas of obscenity and ...