Search results
On June 8, 1959 -- two years after the Watkins and Sweezy decisions -- we decided Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U. S. 109, where a divided Court gave only slight consideration to the type of pertinency claim that was raised in Watkins, Sweezy, and the present case, in part because it could rely on the petitioner's failure to raise that ...
United States, 365 U.S. 431 (1961), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the conviction of the petitioner, Carl Braden, based on his refusal to answer questions posed to him by the House Un-American Activities Committee, did not violate his First Amendment rights and was constitutional.
U.S. Reports: United States v. Lucchese, 365 U.S. 290 (1961). Contributor: Supreme Court of the United States - Brennan, William J., Jr. Date: 1960
“I don’t believe Sylvester Stallone carries around a wallet,” says Braden Aftergood, the executive in charge of scripted development at the movie star’s content company Balboa Prods. It’s not...
Braden v. United States. Media. Oral Argument - November 17, 1960. Opinions. Syllabus. View Case. Petitioner. Braden. Respondent. United States. Docket no. 54. Decided by. Warren Court. Lower court. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Citation. 365 US 431 (1961) Argued. Nov 17, 1960. Decided. Feb 27, 1961. Sort: by seniority.
Bond v. U.S., 529 U.S. 334, 120 S.Ct. 1462 (2000) FACTS: Steven Dewayne Bond was traveling on a bus from California to Little Rock, Arkansas. The bus stopped at a Border Patrol checkpoint in Sierra Blanca, Texas, where a Border Patrol agent boarded the bus to check the immigration status of the passengers.
Summary of this case from United States v. Ogle Ogle holding that an aggravated assault where the defendant intentionally or knowingly assaults another with a deadly weapon qualifies as a violent felony under the use-of-physical-force clause
People also ask
What happened in California v Acevedo?
What is the difference between Colorado v Bertine and Illinois v Rodriguez?
Were the weapons in plain view admissible as evidence against Horton?
