Search results
3 days ago · Community Cats Now Protected Under Ohio Law. We won! In a unanimous decision, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that Ohio’s companion animal cruelty law (R.C. 959.131) protects ALL cats and dogs as “companion animals.” Alley Cat Allies filed an amicus brief in this case, which helped inform the Court’s decision. This is a huge step forward!
5 days ago · A state law elevating the penalty for animal cruelty to a felony protects all dogs and cats, including strays, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today.. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled Alonzo Kyles could be convicted of fifth-degree felony animal cruelty for pouring bleach into an apartment building basement to make an unclaimed cat leave.
5 days ago · Today the Ohio Supreme Court in a 7-0 decision unanimously agreed with the State of Ohio’s interpretation of the law. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that R.C. 959.131(C) protects all dogs and cats. The Court concluded that “‘Any’ means all, and R.C. 959.131 defines ‘companion animal’ as including ‘any’ dog or cat.”
4 days ago · The Ohio Supreme Court decided unanimously that felony animal cruelty applies to all cats and dogs, overturning a previous decision from the Eighth District Court of Appeals.
5 days ago · Attorney Jessie Hill, representing the ACLU of Ohio, addresses the Ohio Supreme Court on Wednesday, Sept. 27, 2023. The justices in the picture, from left: Justices Michael P. Donnelly and Patrick ...
Supreme Court refused to accept the case for review. See State v. Condon, 99 Ohio St.3d 1546, 2003-Ohio-4671, 795 N.E.2d 684. {¶3} State Farm is currently defending Condon, under a reservation of rights, in a federal class-action suit pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
Hamilton County, several individuals employed at the Hamilton County Morgue, and Thomas Condon, a private photographer. Chesher's claims stem from an "art project" that Condon undertook at the ... Ultimately, the prosecutor charged Condon with eight counts of gross abuse of a corpse. See State v. Condon, 157 Ohio App.3d 26, 808 N.E.2d 912, 913 ...
