Revolutionize Your Reports with GenText AI Writing Assistant - Try It Now! Transform Your MS Word Experience with GenText AI Writing Assistant - Get Started!
Popular Links:
Search results
- When Artificial Intelligence and machine learning algorithms are implemented in literature reviews, they help in processing vast amounts of information, identifying highly relevant studies, and generating quick and concise summaries — TL;DR summaries.
typeset.io/resources/using-ai-tools-to-summarize-literature-reviews/
People also ask
Are AI-based tools relevant to the literature review process?
Can Ai be used in systematic literature reviews?
How AI is transforming the literature review process?
How has AI revolutionized academic literature reviews?
Can artificial intelligence be used in systematic literature reviews (SLRs)?
Is Ai a ligence in systematic literature reviews?
Oct 8, 2021 · We conclude this section by outlining four aspects relevant to AI-based tools across the six steps of the literature review process: (1) evaluation and validity, (2) transparency and replicability, (3) compatibility for recombination, and (4) usability.
- Login
We conclude this section by outlining four aspects relevant...
- Forgotten your password
We would like to show you a description here but the site...
- Login
Aug 17, 2024 · This paper presents a comprehensive review of the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs). A SLR is a rigorous and organised methodology that assesses and integrates prior research on a given topic. Numerous tools have been developed to assist and partially automate the SLR process.
- Francisco Bolaños
Oct 12, 2024 · The integration of AI tools into the academic literature review process necessitates a thorough examination of the methodologies employed to assess their impact on efficiency and accuracy.
- Gerit Wagner, Roman Lukyanenko and Guy Par ́e
- Step 3: Screening for inclusion
- Step 5: Data extraction
- A research agenda
- Level I: Supporting infrastructure
- Level II: Methods and tools
- Step 6: Data analysis and interpretation.
- Level III: Research practice
- Declaration of con icting interests
- Funding
- Notes
- Author Biographies
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is beginning to transform traditional research practices in many areas. In this context, literature reviews stand out because they operate on large and rapidly growing volumes of documents, that is, partially structured (meta)data, and pervade almost every type of paper published in information systems research...
In the screening step, authors work with the search results to dissociate the relevant papers from those that must be ex-cluded from the review. This step is typically divided into a rst (more inclusive) screening based on titles and abstracts fi and a second (more restrictive) screening based on full-texts (Templier and Par ́e, 2018). In manual sc...
Data extraction requires researchers to identify relevant fragments of qualitative and quantitative data and to transfer them to a (semi) structured coding sheet (Templier and Par ́e, 2018). It is more salient in descriptive reviews, scoping reviews, and reviews aimed at theory testing compared to reviews that are more selective and interpretive su...
In this section, we outline an agenda suggesting how IS researchers can focus and coordinate their efforts in ad-vancing AILRs. Nurturing a vibrant AILR tradition is a task for the entire scholarly community, including design science researchers, behavioral scientists, methodologists, re-viewers, and journal editors as well as authors of primary re...
Technical infrastructure can greatly facilitate or constrain AILRs. The diversity of infrastructure needed to support a vibrant AILR tradition within IS points to a wide range of related opportunities for research and design. We cover quality assurance, smart search technologies, and enhanced databases.
There are vast opportunities for methodological and tool-centric research on AILRs. We outline promising avenues for research and design in each individual step of the review process and offer complementary recommendations on cross-cutting concerns, covering the need for advancing evaluation studies, conceptions of validity, and the notion of trans...
Regarding the nal fi step, we focus on knowledge integration and inductive theory development. With knowledge integration still posing challenges for prospective authors, we call for the development of discipline-specic algorithms to address fi issues especially prevalent in IS, such as similarity as-sessment of IS measurement items or IS construct...
AILRs require broader considerations, which we believe, should involve the entire IS community, including authors of papers surveyed by AILRs, their reviewers, community thought leaders, and innovators interested in improving the way we conduct research. We highlight two broad streams of discussion pertaining to standardization and sharing.
fl The author(s) declared no potential con icts of interest with re- fl spect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The author(s) received no nancial support for the research, au- fi thorship, and/or publication of this article.
We use the term“tool in a broad sense, covering applications ” offering graphical user interfaces (GUI), statistical packages, as well as programming libraries, for example. For the sake of completeness, we recognize that some tools support multiple steps of the review process (e.g., Covidence, Rayyan QCRI, Parsifal, SRDB.PRO, and SESRA). These too...
Gerit Wagner is a postdoctoral fellow at HEC Montr ́eal. His research focuses on literature reviews, the impact of re-search methods, digital health, and digital platforms for knowledge work. His research has been published in in-ternational journals, including the Journal of Strategic In-formation Systems, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Inf...
Oct 18, 2024 · This overlap indicates that the AI system was able to identify reviewers that editors considered appropriate, validating its potential utility in the selection process (Table 2 summarizes the key performance metrics of the AI-assisted reviewer selection process). The accuracy varied across disciplines, with higher rates of agreement in fields like Chemistry (58%) and lower in areas like Public ...
Feb 13, 2024 · Enrico Motta. The Open University (UK) Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet. References (159) Abstract. This manuscript presents a comprehensive review of the...
AI-powered tools can quickly identify relevant studies, extract key themes and concepts, and even generate summaries. In recent years, using AI for literature reviews has gained significant importance in academic research.
