Milo Hoffmann
Search results
- Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948) (also known as the Hollywood Antitrust Case of 1948, the Paramount Case, or the Paramount Decision), was a landmark United States Supreme Court antitrust case that decided the fate of film studios owning their own theatres and holding exclusivity rights on which theatres would show their movies.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc.
People also ask
Is antitrust a movie?
What was the Paramount case?
Who are the actors in 'antitrust'?
Is Antitrust a cynical conspiracy thriller?
When did antitrust start?
Does the HSR Act protect movie distributors from antitrust violations?
Sep 7, 2018 · Antitrust, released in 2001, is an extremely dot-com-era take on the conspiracy thriller genre. The film starts with hotshot programmer Milo Hoffman (Ryan Phillippe) getting recruited by tech...
- 5 Stories
Antitrust crusaders have built up serious momentum in...
- 5 Stories
Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948) (also known as the Hollywood Antitrust Case of 1948, the Paramount Case, or the Paramount Decision), was a landmark United States Supreme Court antitrust case that decided the fate of film studios owning their own theatres and holding exclusivity rights on which theatres would show their movies.
What are we to make of a brainy nerd hero who fears his girlfriend is trying to kill him by adding sesame seeds to the Chinese food, and administers a quick allergy test at a romantic dinner by scratching himself with a fork and rubbing on some of the brown sauce? Too goofy.
In a secret NURV database of employee surveillance dossiers, Hoffman discovers highly-sensitive personal information about Lisa Calighan (Cook), a friendly co-worker. When he says he knows the company has this information about her, she agrees to help him expose NURV's crimes.
- Background
- Discussion
- Conclusion
In 1938, the Department of Justice brought an antitrust action against eight companies—Paramount Pictures, Inc. ("Paramount"), Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. ("Fox"), Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc. ("Warner"), Loew's Incorporated ("Loew's"), Radio-Keith-Orpheum ("RKO"), Universal Corp. ("Universal"), Columbia Pictures Corp. ("Columbia), and Unite...
I. Standard of Review Under Rules 60(b)(5) and 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on "motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party . . . from a final judgment [when] . . . applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or any other reason that justifies relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Each of the Decrees provides that this...
For the reasons stated above, the Government's motion is GRANTED. The Decrees are terminated, effective immediately, except for a two-year sunset period on the Decrees' provisions banning block booking and circuit dealing. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 1 and 2 and close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 7, 2...
Nov 13, 2009 · On May 3, 1948, the U.S. Supreme Court issues a decision in U.S. v. Paramount Pictures, et al., the government’s long-running antitrust lawsuit against Paramount Pictures and seven other...
The 1948 Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. Paramount Pictures, et al, dealt a crushing blow to the Hollywood studios, and effectively brought an end to the studio system of classic cinema. This Great Hollywood Antitrust Case was actually two major suits (an numerous minor ones).
