Search results
David Hume argued that Individual Liberty emerged slowly out of the “violent system of government” which had earlier prevailed in Europe (1778)
This paper reveals connections between Hume's virtue ethics and his political philosophy by investigating two specific ques tions. First, is allegiance to government, as Hume understands it, a virtue of character like other virtues that Hume recognizes (such as justice and fidelity to promises)? Second, can Hume ac
Oct 29, 2004 · Hume's position in ethics, which is based on his empiricist theory of the mind, is best known for asserting four theses: (1) Reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, but rather is the “slave of the passions” (see Section 3) (2) Morals are not derived from reason (see Section 4).
Jun 5, 2012 · Summary. P olitical writers have established it as a maxim, that, in contriving any system of government, and fixing the several checks and controuls of the constitution, every man ought to be supposed a knave, and to have no other end, in all his actions, but private interest.
Oct 25, 2017 · Introduces the relevant elements of Hume’s epistemology and metaphysics and theory of the passions, followed by extensive discussions of Hume’s critique of moral rationalism, his account of the virtues, and his theory of moral judgment.
In his quite realistic and sometimes cynical understanding of politics Hume argued that, when designing constitutional rules to govern the behaviour of politicians and bureaucrats, we must assume the “worst”, namely that these people will act like “knaves” unless prevented from doing so.
People also ask
Did David Hume have a moral theory?
What did David Hume say about politics?
What did David Hume say about individual liberty?
Who was David Hume?
Is Hume a Conservative apologist for the status quo?
What does David Hume say about a Turkey?
Hardin’s approach to Hume is entirely by means of the famous is-ought distinction. Not only does Hardin take this distinction to be the axis of Hume’s moral and political theory, but he also gives a profoundly radical interpretation of Hume’s intention in proposing the distinction in the first place.Hardinbegins
