Search results
companion piece to Ortmann and Hertwig (2002), building on, complementing and extending their review of psychological research on the methodological costs of deception. Ortmann and Hertwig’s review was written for economists, and it focused on the question of whether experimental economics should lift its de facto prohibition of deception.
Mar 31, 2008 · Ortmann and Hertwig's review was written for economists, and it focused on the question of whether experimental economics should lift its de facto prohibition of deception. The present article, in contract, addresses an audience of psychologists and discusses, among other issues, whether psychology's regulatory regime regarding the use of deception is effective.
- Ralph Hertwig, Andreas Ortmann
- 2008
and Hertwig (2002), building on, complementing and extending their review of psy - chological research on the methodological costs of deception. Ortmann and Hertwig’s review was written for economists, and it focused on the question of whether experi - mental economics should lift its de facto prohibition of deception. The present article,
Albeit speculative, it is plausible that psychology’s peculiar institutional arrangements (to recruit participants mostly from introductory courses) is the result 124 ORTMANN AND HERTWIG of an evolutionary process—a process driven by attempts to minimize the contaminating effects of deception on the participant pool (and by the desire to guarantee “free” access to participants).
Aug 9, 2017 · Ralph Hertwig, Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany E-mail: hertwig@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
Ralph Hertwig. Ralph Hertwig ... sekgd@mpib-berlin.mpg.de Phone: +49 30 82406-210 ... Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful ...
Wegwarth, O., Hertwig, R., Giese, H., & Fineberg, H. V. (2024). The impact of nontransparent health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine-hesitant ...
