Search results
Oct 3, 2004 · The idea of substance has its first theoretical articulation in Aristotle’s Categories, where he distinguishes between individual substances, such as a man or a horse, and the various kinds of properties they can possess, such as being five foot, white, lying down, or in the Lyceum (1b25–2a4).
- Form Vs. Matter
Aristotle famously contends that every physical object is a...
- Leibniz on Causation
It has been noted that “[p]erhaps the greatest difference...
- Identity
But this argument fails. The predicate “is a man” will also...
- Kant, Immanuel
Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) is the central figure in modern...
- Form Vs. Matter
Jan 5, 2016 · The form constitutes the nature or essence of the substance, and it explains why humans laugh, horses neigh, and water cools down when removed from a source of heat (Suárez, Disputationes metaphysicae, XV.1). Substantial forms must be distinguished from real qualities, which are accidents.
Mar 15, 2020 · This essay will summarise Aristotle’s conception of substance as he presents it in The Categories, briefly explain what distinguishes substance from the other categories, and offer some additional thoughts about the metaphysics of being, in relation to Aristotle’s mentor, Plato.
In its first sense, “substance” refers to those things that are object-like, rather that property-like. For example, an elephant is a substance in this sense, whereas the height or colour of the elephant is not. In its second sense, “substance” refers to the fundamental building blocks of reality.
The essence of things (whether an artifact like a ship or the souls of plants, animals, and humans) was termed the thing’s “substantial form.” Forms make and express the substance of things. The thing’s substantial form makes a thing what it is, and makes it possible to conceive of it and to know it.
Sep 10, 2020 · Incidental (or accidental) changes modify the substance’s incidental forms (or properties) like quality, quantity, place, while substantial change modifies its existence. The following OntoUML diagram presents Aquinas’s model of substance and change:
People also ask
Why does Aristotle call a substance a substantial form?
Which substance has only one substantial form according to Aquinas?
Can a substantial change be a substance?
What is the difference between accidental change and substantial change?
What is Aristotle's distinction between substances and non-substances?
What is Aristotle's primary substance?
individual substance such as Socrates will be generated just in case the "form" of the new composite is a substantial form, e.g., the essence or nature of human being (which is human soul). An individual substance will be destroyed just in case the "lack" which is lost is a substantial form.