Search results
- The film received generally negative reviews from critics and holds a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 13% based on 23 reviews. The site's critical consensus reads, " Arthur ' s boozy charm curdles into a bad hangover in this unnecessary sequel." The Washington Post opined that "the result is about as funny as the plight of an alcoholic."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_2:_On_the_Rocks
People also ask
Is Arthur 2 a good movie?
Is there a sequel to Arthur 2?
Will there be a King Arthur sequel?
Is Arthur a good movie?
Was Arthur 2 on the Rocks released in Canada?
What happens in Arthur 2 on the rocks?
The movie offered just a bit of pathos, with Arthur's loneliness, Linda's low socioeconomic status, and Hobson's terminal illness. But overall, it was a plucky, stylish little comedy and you...
- (23)
- Bud Yorkin
- PG
- Dudley Moore
Arthur 2 is not as good as the film that preceeded it but it is NOT a bad film. Arthur 2 if anything gives us the film that Dudley Moore and Steve Gordon were trying to back in 1981. One of the main criticism's is that it gives out a bad message the alcoholism is good.
The film received generally negative reviews from critics and holds a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 13% based on 23 reviews. The site's critical consensus reads, " Arthur ' s boozy charm curdles into a bad hangover in this unnecessary sequel." [2]
- Camelot. The only film able to oust Lowery's The Green Knight from the top spot is the timeless Arthurian tale Camelot. Based on the 1960 stage musical of the same name by Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe, Joshua Logan's Camelot is an unabashed and glittering production whose every shot is sumptuous by design.
- The Green Knight. Not many superlatives can adequately do justice to the visual feast that is The Green Knight's entire 130-minute runtime as it honors and deconstructs its source material in equal measure.
- Monty Python And The Holy Grail. Although there are many King Arthur movies that provide comical moments, there are none that hold a candle to Terry Gilliam's comedic masterpiece, The Holy Grail.
- The Sword In The Stone. The Sword In The Stone taught generations of children the Arthurian legend in the years following its 1963 release and continues to be celebrated to this day.
- How King Arthur: Legend of The Sword Slayed A Possible Franchise
- What Warner Brothers’ Arthurian Shared Cinematic Universe Would Have Looked Like
- Why King Arthur: Legend of The Sword Deserves A Rewatch
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword, filmed all over the UK, had a production budget of $175 million. However, it grossed only $148 million worldwide. The film didn’t do well with critics either, who weren’t on board with the pace, story, and how it excised much of what makes the story a classic. These failures are what ultimately killed all plans for...
Had King Arthur: Legend of the Sword worked out, Warner Bros. had a King Arthur shared universe plan ready to go. Following the critical failure of King Arthur in 2004, Warner Bros. was looking to adapt the Arthurian legend one more time, and after a couple of ideas that were eventually dropped (such as a movie titled Arthur & Lancelot which could ...
Despite being a box office blunder, King Arthur: Legend of the Sword is still a solid and enjoyable fantasy adventure film that deserves to be seen. All of the elements that the movie had going for it, such as the beloved source material, strong ensemble cast, and very high production value (thanks to the enormous budget Warner Bros. allotted) offe...
- Adrienne Tyler
- Senior Staff Writer
Jul 20, 2010 · The anticipated 2011 release of a remake of the film starring English bad boy, Russell Brand, will surely send a new generation in search of the original. Sadly, “Arthur” was writer/director Steve Gordon’s last film. The filmmaker died of heart failure in 1982, months after the release of the movie.
Arthur 2: On the Rocks: Directed by Bud Yorkin. With Dudley Moore, Liza Minnelli, John Gielgud, Geraldine Fitzgerald. Arthur loses his fortune for staying with Linda, right as the two were preparing to adopt a child.
