Search results
May 28, 2024 · Setelah paham dengan hal-hal yang harus dipersiapkan, format, dan contohnya, kamu bisa langsung mulai membuat review jurnal. Langkah-langkahnya adalah sebagai berikut: 1. Baca Bagian Pendahuluan. Pertama, baca dan pahami terlebih dahulu bagian pendahuluan dari jurnal yang ingin kamu review.
- 1. Pertama, baca dan pahami terlebih dahulu bagian pendahuluan dari jurnal yang ingin kamu review. Kamu tidak harus menuliskan ini langsung ke dala...
- 2. Selanjutnya, bacalah pembahasan inti dari jurnal yang ingin kamu review.
- 3. Setelah selesai dengan pembahasan utamanya, lanjutkan dengan membaca bagian hasil dan kesimpulan dari penelitian.
- 4. Setelah semua bagian kamu baca dan kamu tuliskan poin-poin pentingnya, sekarang saatnya menuliskannya ke dalam format review jurnal. Tuliskan sa...
- 5. Jika kamu sudah selesai menuliskan hasil review, jangan buru-buru untuk mengumpulkan atau mempublikasikannya. Lakukan revisi dulu terhadap hasil...
- Examples of ‘Minor Revisions’ Reviewer Comments
- Examples of ‘Major Revisions’ Reviewer Comments
- Examples of ‘Revise and Resubmit’ Reviewer Comments
- Examples of ‘Reject’ Reviewer Comments
“This is a well-written manuscript that only needs to undergo a few minor changes. First, …”“The manuscript is based on impressive empirical evidence and makes an original contribution. Only minor revisions are needed before it can be published.”“I thoroughly enjoyed reviewing this manuscript and only have some minor requests for revision.”“The authors develop a unique theoretical framework, and I believe that they should highlight their originality much more.”“The manuscript shows a lot of promise, but some major issues need to be addressed before it can be published.”“This manuscript addresses a timely topic and makes a relevant contribution to the field. However, some major revisions are needed before it can be published.”“I enjoyed reading this manuscript, and believe that it is very promising. At the same time, I identified several issues that require the authors’ attention.”“The manuscript sheds light on an interesting phenomenon. However, it also has several shortcomings. I strongly encourage the authors to address the following points.”“I encourage the authors to revise their manuscript and to resubmit it to the journal.”“In its current form, this paper cannot be considered for publication. However, I see value in the research approach and encourage the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript.”“With the right changes, I believe that this manuscript can make a valuable contribution to the field of …”“The paper addresses a valuable topic and raises interesting questions. However, the logic of the argument is difficult to follow.““I do not believe that this journal is a good fit for this paper.”“While the paper addresses an interesting issue, it is not publishable in its current form.”“In its current state, I do not recommend accepting this paper.”“Unfortunately, the literature review is inadequate. It lacks..”Jul 6, 2021 · Abstract. This article aims to provide an overview of the structure, form and content of systematic reviews. It focuses in particular on the literature searching component, and covers systematic database searching techniques, searching for grey literature and the importance of librarian involvement in the search.
Aug 28, 2017 · Introduction. Literature review is an essential feature of academic research. Fundamentally, knowledge advancement must be built on prior existing work. To push the knowledge frontier, we must know where the frontier is. By reviewing relevant literature, we understand the breadth and depth of the existing body of work and identify gaps to explore.
Jan 22, 2020 · OBJECTIVE. In this article, we provide a step-by-step guide to reviewing a manuscript that we hope will improve the quality of reviews for the AJR. CONCLUSION. We have provided a detailed series of guidelines for providing excellent reviews of manuscripts. The template we have provided can be used to serve as a checklist for important questions to ask about manuscripts during the review ...
Jun 23, 2016 · Writing a literature review requires a range of skills to gather, sort, evaluate and summarise peer-reviewed published data into a relevant and informative unbiased narrative. Digital access to research papers, academic texts, review articles, reference databases and public data sets are all sources of information that are available to enrich ...
People also ask
How should a systematic review be conducted?
How does a systematic review differ from other types of literature review?
Should a systematic review be included in a scoping search?
Should poor quality studies be excluded from a systematic review?
Sep 1, 2021 · The main purpose of a review article is to reconcile conflicting findings and suggest novel and new directions for a given field of research with reference to methodology, theory, constructs and contexts for others to examine using quantitative or qualitative methods ( Canabal and White, 2008, Hao et al., 2019 ).
