Search results
5 days ago · Law360 (July 10, 2024, 5:43 PM EDT) — On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a decades-old precedent, known as Chevron deference, that favored federal agencies’ rulemaking interpretations.
1 day ago · Raimondo and overruled Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., putting an end to the 40-year precedent that required the courts to give deference to federal government ...
5 days ago · Now, under Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, when courts are faced with an ambiguous statute enforced by a federal administrative agency, courts must independently interpret those statutes using the traditional tools of statutory construction. Courts can no longer simply defer to the agency’s interpretation.
22 hours ago · Courts Narrow Administrative Power of Federal Agencies – In a 6 – 3 decision in the case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the United States Supreme Court overturned a 40 year precedent and decided that the interpretation of statutes by federal agencies are not entitled to deference. According to Chief Justice Roberts, “Courts must ...
4 days ago · V. Raimondo, No. 22-451, and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, No. 22-1219 (June 28, 2024), the Supreme Court redefined the process by which courts will review certain federal agency actions. Under Chevron, courts had previously granted a high degree of deference to federal agencies when agencies interpreted and applied statutory law.
5 days ago · Raimondo, the Court overruled its longstanding Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), holding that had previously directed courts to defer to an agency's interpretation of the law when a statute was ambiguous.
5 days ago · Opinion Highlights. FTC Lacks Substantive Rulemaking Authority.While the court acknowledged that the FTC has some authority to promulgate rules concerning unfair methods of competition, it held that the FTC’s power is limited to procedural or “housekeeping” rules, and that the FTC does not have the power to create substantive rules regarding unfair methods of competition.
