Search results
- Energy Transfer is a bigger, more diversified company than Williams Companies. Looking at the scale of the two companies, you can see that ET is much larger in terms of pipelines, revenue, and varied sources of revenue. ET has a total of more than 100,000 miles of pipelines versus WMB's approximately 15,000.
People also ask
Who is energy transfer vs Williams?
Why did Williams vs energy transfer win a 7-year legal fight?
Did energy transfer pay Williams Companies A $410 million termination fee?
Why did Energy Transfer LP pay $410 million?
Who is Energy Transfer LP v Williams Cos?
Why did energy transfer buy Williams Companies?
Feb 11, 2022 · Energy Transfer was directed to pay Williams Companies (WMB-0.27%) a $410 million termination fee for a deal that was scuttled over five years ago. There's one big detail here that matters....
Feb 2, 2022 · Energy Transfer (ET) is a bigger, more diversified firm than Williams (WMB). Do you want higher sales and profits or better gross margins? Read my analysis here.
- Bill Zettler
Jun 30, 2024 · Energy Transfer and Williams have been bitter rivals since a $33bn takeover bid led by Warren collapsed in 2016, prompting years of litigation. In October, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled Energy...
- Jamie Smyth
Oct 12, 2023 · After a seven-year legal battle, Williams (WMB) emerges victorious in the high-stake dispute with Energy Transfer over a failed merger, securing a $495-million court victory.
Dec 30, 2021 · Dec 30 (Reuters) - A Delaware judge ordered oil pipeline operator Energy Transfer LP (ET.N) to pay rival Williams Cos (WMB.N) $410 million for abandoning their $33 billion merger, one of the...
Oct 10, 2023 · Williams Cos. prevailed Tuesday in a seven-year legal fight over its failed $33 billion merger with Energy Transfer LP, fending off the rival pipeline operator’s challenge to its $495 million court victory.
Dec 30, 2021 · Oil-pipeline giant Energy Transfer LP must pay $410 million for scuttling a $33 billion merger with rival Williams Cos. over a tax flaw in the deal, a judge concluded.
