Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. Jun 28, 2005 · "War of the Worlds" is a big, clunky movie containing some sensational sights but lacking the zest and joyous energy we expect from Steven Spielberg. It proceeds with the lead-footed deliberation of its 1950s predecessors to give us an alien invasion that is malevolent, destructive and, from the alien point of view, pointless.

  3. War of the Worlds is that most rare of screen adaptations - a film that is faithful to its origins and at the same time, its own separate creature. The first half is better than the...

  4. Dec 2, 2022 · The ending of Steven Spielberg's "War of the Worlds" has always divided audiences. Here's our deep dive into the film's controversial conclusion.

  5. Jun 29, 2005 · Steven Spielberg's adaptation of War of the Worlds delivers on the thrill and paranoia of H.G. Wells' classic novel while impressively updating the action and effects for modern audiences. Read...

    • (267)
    • Steven Spielberg
    • PG-13
    • Tom Cruise
    • Is War of the Worlds a good movie?1
    • Is War of the Worlds a good movie?2
    • Is War of the Worlds a good movie?3
    • Is War of the Worlds a good movie?4
    • Is War of the Worlds a good movie?5
  6. War of the Worlds is a 2005 American science fiction action-thriller film directed by Steven Spielberg and written by Josh Friedman and David Koepp, loosely based on H. G. Wells' 1898 novel, The War of the Worlds.

  7. Jun 29, 2005 · War of the Worlds is an expensive Sci-Fi action disaster film. Star cast, eminent director and good literary primary source. What could go wrong? And it's enough just to transfer the action of the film to modernity. And here's a kind of disaster movie from Spielberg.

  8. Jan 1, 2000 · War Of The Worlds Review. Divorcee Ray Ferrier (Cruise) is lumbered with his kids for the weekend. Hardly a model dad, Ferrier is struggling for fun things to do. Not to worry, alien war...

  1. People also search for