Search results
- This week in AI, generative AI is beginning to spam up academic publishing — a discouraging new development on the disinformation front.
techcrunch.com/2024/06/19/this-week-in-ai-generative-ai-is-spamming-up-academic-journals/
People also ask
Does generative AI spam academic publishing?
Can generative Ai be used in Scien-Tific publishing?
Do editors have access to generative AI?
Can ai transform scientific communication & publishing?
Can artificial intelligence transform scholarly publishing?
Are generative AI tools plagiarism?
Jul 30, 2024 · Although there have been instances of generative AI producing text that looks almost identical to existing, human-written content, it is usually not close enough to be considered plagiarism,...
Mar 23, 2024 · When rogue academics use generative AI to fabricate datasets, they will not need to pay a papermill and will generate sham papers themselves. Fake studies will exponentially surge and nobody is doing enough to stop this inevitability. Prevention lies in big and small changes that will be costly and difficult.
some of the ways in which AI could transform scientific communication and publishing. Science publishers are already experimenting with gen. rative AI in scientific search tools and for...
Aug 17, 2023 · Not disclosing use of AI would mean authors are passing off generative AI content as their own, which could be considered plagiarism.
- Amanda Hoover
Jan 31, 2024 · The AI guidelines identified all referred to GAI based models or the generative ability of AI, instead of discussing the use of AI more broadly. Of the top 100 largest publishers, 24% had released guidance on GAI.
Oct 1, 2023 · Although editors must rely on authors to honestly and transparently disclose their use of generative AI, editors should have access (through their publishers or through other services) to tools that can detect whether generative AI was used (and potentially how it was used) in a submitted paper.
