Search results
Electronic access to court information is restricted by federal and state law in addition to court rules and orders. Information on this site is made available as a public service pursuant to order of the Indiana Supreme Court.
public.courts.in.gov. Search cases, protection orders, child abuse registry and other collections. Start searching. Public Records. If you need assistance finding records, consider seeking help from your local library, the Indiana State Library, or the Indiana Supreme Court Law Library.
- Opinion by Justice David
- David, Justice.
- Conclusion
Chief Justice Rush and Justices Massa, Slaughter, and Goff concur.
Indiana’s Constitution affords its citizens certain rights, including the right to counsel through all stages of a prosecution. That right entitles an accused to consult with counsel while in police custody. In Pirtle v. State, our Court relied on our State Constitution to require an advisement of rights prior to police obtaining consent to a sea...
For the aforementioned reasons, we find that consent to a DRE does not require an advisement of rights under Pirtle. The trial court correctly determined that the evidence obtained as a result of the exam was admissible. Accordingly, we affirm Dycus’s conviction. Rush, C.J., and Massa, Slaughter, and Goff, JJ., concur. ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ...
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 22A-CR-2923 | August 14, 2023 Page 1 of 8 Case Summary [1] Following a bench trial, Marion Young was convicted of trespass, a Class A misdemeanor. Young appeals and claims that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
Hayko v. State. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court excluding the opinion testimony from three of Defendant's family members regarding the victim's untruthful character, holding that the trial court erred in excluding the opinion testimony but that the error was harmless.
