Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Oct 24, 2021 · In Ramesh Sippy v. Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh & Ors ., the Bombay High Court held that both those who are creative (authors of literary, musical, dramatic, or artistic work) or those who finance creativity (sound recording and cinematography) including companies and partnership firms, etc are authors under the statute.

    • Lokesh Vyas
  2. Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh. Smart Summary (Beta) Facts. The plaintiff, Ramesh Sippy, has filed a suit claiming to be the author and first owner of the copyright and Author's Special Rights in the film titled "Sholay" ("the said film Sholay") and four other films. Issue.

  3. Aug 4, 2015 · Shaan Ranjeet Uttam Singh and Ors. when the High Court laid down two important principles. Firstly, the conduct of the party is relevant when copyright is asserted after a long duration from the work being first created.

  4. Apr 1, 2013 · Case Law. Notice of Motion No. 406 of 2013 in Suit No. 166 of 2013. Case: Ramesh Sippy Vs Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh and others. High Court of Bombay (India) Judgment Cited authorities 1 Cited in Precedent Map Related. Vincent. Order: S. J. Kathawalla, J.

    • High Court of Bombay (India)
    • S. J. Kathawalla, J.
    • April 01, 2013
  5. Jul 27, 2015 · The sphere of intellectual property witnessed judicial development in Ramesh Sippy v. Shaan Ranjeet Uttam Singh and Ors. when the High Court laid down two important principles. Firstly, the conduct of the party is relevant when copyright is asserted after a long duration from the work being first created.

  6. Jan 2, 2014 · Ramesh Sippy vs Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh . on 2 January, 2014. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. [Cites 0, Cited by 3] Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query ( Query Alert Service ).

  7. People also ask

  8. Sep 15, 2023 · Shaan Ranjeet Uttamsingh & Ors. [2013 (55) PTC 95 (Bom)], the Bombay High Court ruled that the movie’s producer is considered its author since they’re responsible for the financial arrangements...

  1. People also search for