Search results
Jun 13, 2024 · School exclusion does not directly make young people criminals, but it does increase the risk that they end up in contact with the criminal justice system. School can act as a protective...
Nov 13, 2012 · interventions to reduce juvenile re-offending. The review provides answers to the question of the relative effectiveness of selected interventions in reducing juvenile re-offending. Details about the process of of completing this work and the studies included in the review can be found in the found in the full technical report (Newman et al 2012).
Apr 25, 2022 · This report summarises findings from a structured review of the evidence for alternatives to CJS responses, which was undertaken to establish what works to reduce offending and improve outcomes for...
Offenders with zero or one previous convictions and released from custody on licence had a one-year reoffending rate between 14 and 17 percentage points lower than those released from...
- 388KB
- 58
May 8, 2015 · Research aims and overview. This evidence review was undertaken to support strategic thinking regarding what works to reduce reoffending. The aim of the review was to examine the research into reducing reoffending, the process (es) by which individuals stop offending, and the impact of the criminal justice system in these processes.
Juvenile justice systems should help prevent reoffending through structured risk and needs assessments and using interventions rooted in knowledge about adolescent development.
Feb 7, 2024 · A juvenile court’s decision to remove young people from their homes and place them in state-funded residential facilities in response to delinquent behavior generally fails to reduce future crime. And, in many cases, that action will increase children's likelihood to re-offend or drop out of school.
