Search results
Oct 22, 2022 · 51-year-old Vokes (plaintiff) claimed Arthur Murray (Defendant), the franchisor of Arthur Murray Dance Schools, used flattery to make her believe she was a good dancer capable of making dance her career. She claimed Arthur Murray convinced her to buy dancing lessons.
May 4, 2022 · Vokes Ltd v Bear: 1973. The court discussed whether, having found errors in the employer’s dismissal of the emploee, the tribunal can take into account other circumstances to say that the employee might have been dismissed in any event.
The Plaintiff, Vokes (Plaintiff), a 51 year-old widow, desired to be an “accomplished dancer.” The Defendant, J.P. Davenport d/b/a Davenport’s school of dancing (a franchise of Arthur Murray, Inc.) (Defendant), vowed to help make that dream come true.
Feb 24, 2021 · 13 April 2021 — See all updates. Country: England and Wales. Jurisdiction code: Disability Discrimination. Decision date: 10 January 2021. Read the full decision in Mr C Vokes v TUI Airways Ltd...
- HM Courts & Tribunals Service
It is well established that a dismissal is likely to be unfair if the employer gave no consideration at all to whether suitable alternative employment existed within its organisation ( Vokes Limited v Bear [1973] IRLR 363).
Dec 4, 2020 · Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc. | 212 So.2d 906 (1968) A lonely widow captivated by the glamour of ballroom dancing, the glittering gowns, the charming instructors, and the effusive praise, buys...
- 3 min
- 2.9K
- Quimbee
View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, Vokes v Bear [1974] I.C.R. 1 (31 October 1973), PrimarySources.
