Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Aug 4, 2017 · Sch.4, para.2, Land Registration Act 2002 provides that a court may only make an order for the alteration of the register for the purpose of (a) correcting a mistake, (b) bringing the register up to date, or (c) giving effect to any estate, right or interest excepted from the effect of registration. Moreover, the fact that the rectification of ...

  2. uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com › 7/107/6849Mistake | Practical Law

    Mistake. A contract can be voided under common law rules for mistake in the following situations: Common mistake (where the mistake is shared by both parties, is fundamental and directly affects the basic definition of what the parties are contracting for). The mistake will render the contract void if it robs it of all substance. Mutual mistake ...

  3. May 14, 2019 · Paragraph 1 – which provides that in Schedule 4 “references to rectification, in relation to alteration of the register, are to alteration which— (a) involves the correction of a mistake, and (b) prejudicially affects the title of a registered proprietor.”

  4. unilateral mistake applies to cases where only one party is mistaken about: the terms of the contract, or; the identity of the parties; Unilateral mistake does not cater for mistakes of fact. Mutual Mistake applies to misunderstandings by both parties of: the identity of the contracting parties, or; the terms of the contract Remedies

  5. The key distinction is where the impossibility of the contract occurs. If the impossibility, unknown to the parties, is present before the creation of the contract, this will amount to mistake. Where the contract becomes impossible subsequent to the creation of it, this will amount to frustration.

  6. Oct 11, 2019 · How do I make a claim for property misrepresentation? What are the most common types of neighbour disputes? What is the burden of proof for professional negligence? How can a property encroachment dispute be resolved?

  7. People also ask

  8. Jul 31, 2023 · Generally, the claimant is entitled to seek a personal remedy that requires the defendant to pay the claimant the value of the enrichment which the defendant has obtained at the claimant’s expense (otherwise known as ‘restitution’).