Search results
May 4, 2022 · The court discussed whether, having found errors in the employer’s dismissal of the emploee, the tribunal can take into account other circumstances to say that the employee might have been dismissed in any event. Held: Sir Hugh Griffiths said: ‘We are unable to accept the submission that ‘the circumstances’ are limited to those directly affecting … Continue reading Vokes Ltd v Bear: 1973
What was the main legal issue in Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.? The central legal issue was whether the representations made by the dance studio to Vokes about her dancing abilities constituted actionable fraudulent misrepresentations or were merely non-actionable opinions or sales puffery.
Take a look back at Sam Vokes' career in Claret and Blue.
- 10 min
- 7.4K
- Burnley Football Club
Aug 6, 2019 · This principle was established in the case of Vokes Limited v Bear [1973] IRLR 363. However, the case of Quinton Hazell v WC Earl [1976] IRLR 296 clarified that the employer does not need to make every possible effort to look for an alternative employment, it would be sufficient if the employer can show that they made reasonable efforts.
Jan 8, 2024 · Read the full decision in Miss S Vokes v Shine Bright Day Care and Out of School Club Ltd: 1804955/2023 - Rule 21. Updates to this page. Published 8 January 2024 Explore the topic.
May 22, 2021 · Did Jan Vokes pay only £350 for the mare that she used to breed Dream Alliance? Yes. Jan Vokes' husband, Brian Vokes, found the mare, Rewbell, which was initially available for £1000. The discounted price was partially the result of a barbed-wire injury, which had left the horse's legs scarred.
AMI used trips (to be paid for by Vokes) and “awards” to induce Vokes to buy lessons even when Vokes had hundreds of hours in credit. In fact, Vokes had no aptitude for dance, was not progressing, and could not even hear the musical beat. Vokes sued AMI to void the contract and recover the portion of her payments not used for classes.
